Skip to content

feat: improve value-chain command with visibility rationale#192

Closed
tractorjuice wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/improve-value-chain-prompt
Closed

feat: improve value-chain command with visibility rationale#192
tractorjuice wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/improve-value-chain-prompt

Conversation

@tractorjuice
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Visibility Assessment now requires per-component rationale explaining why each score was assigned (e.g., "0.85 — citizen interacts directly; failure immediately visible") instead of just listing scores
  • Validation Checklist now appears as a visible section with pass/fail evidence per check instead of being implicit

How this was found

Iteration Score Status Change
0 (baseline) 8.4 keep
1 9.0 keep Visibility rationale + validation checklist

Net: 2 lines changed, score 8.4 → 9.0

Test plan

  • Run /arckit:wardley.value-chain and verify Visibility Assessment table has rationale column
  • Verify Validation Checklist section appears with pass/fail status and evidence
  • Run python scripts/converter.py to regenerate extension formats

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…ation checklist

Require visibility assessment table with per-component rationale
explaining why each score was assigned. Require validation checklist
as a visible section with pass/fail evidence per check.

Found via autoresearch experiment loop (score 8.4 → 9.0).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
tractorjuice added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2026
Merged 6 pre-autoresearch prompt quality PRs into the combined branch:

- #187 requirements: user personas, UC structure, Given/When/Then AC
- #188 adr: measurable consequences with project-specific metrics
- #189 backlog: strict acceptance criteria rules (testable, thresholds)
- #191 wardley: math-validated stage boundaries table
- #192 wardley.value-chain: visibility rationale and validation checklist
- #194 wardley.climate: recommended action field with specificity rules

All autoresearch additions (scores, traceability) preserved alongside
the quality improvements. Lint passes. Converter regenerated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@tractorjuice
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Merged into #265 (combined autoresearch PR)

@tractorjuice tractorjuice deleted the feat/improve-value-chain-prompt branch March 27, 2026 23:52
tractorjuice added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2026
Merged 6 pre-autoresearch prompt quality PRs into the combined branch:

- #187 requirements: user personas, UC structure, Given/When/Then AC
- #188 adr: measurable consequences with project-specific metrics
- #189 backlog: strict acceptance criteria rules (testable, thresholds)
- #191 wardley: math-validated stage boundaries table
- #192 wardley.value-chain: visibility rationale and validation checklist
- #194 wardley.climate: recommended action field with specificity rules

All autoresearch additions (scores, traceability) preserved alongside
the quality improvements. Lint passes. Converter regenerated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant