Skip to content

Add reusable lint workflow#396

Closed
benjeffery wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
use-reusable-lint-workflow
Closed

Add reusable lint workflow#396
benjeffery wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
use-reusable-lint-workflow

Conversation

@benjeffery

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Sep 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.85%. Comparing base (37cda03) to head (c9b755b).
⚠️ Report is 35 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #396   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.85%   96.85%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         794      794           
  Branches      150      150           
=======================================
  Hits          769      769           
  Misses         15       15           
  Partials       10       10           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@benjeffery benjeffery force-pushed the use-reusable-lint-workflow branch from ef8705e to 4fa295e Compare September 9, 2025 11:30
@benjeffery

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Just realised this repo doesn't have any linting. This is what it would look like to add - there are many issues to fix to make the lint pass. In the other tskit repos I have sometimes found real issues with this so might be worth doing, but I don't have time right now.

@benjeffery benjeffery marked this pull request as draft September 9, 2025 16:05
@jeromekelleher

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Superseded by #411

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants