Skip to content

docs(vertex): show image provider setup#15332

Open
Kage18 wants to merge 1 commit into
vercel:mainfrom
Kage18:kage-doc-google-vertex-image-setup
Open

docs(vertex): show image provider setup#15332
Kage18 wants to merge 1 commit into
vercel:mainfrom
Kage18:kage-doc-google-vertex-image-setup

Conversation

@Kage18

@Kage18 Kage18 commented May 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • update the Google Vertex image-generation example to show explicit provider setup
  • include project and location before calling googleVertex.image

Fixes #7587.

Kage usage

  • Used Kage scoped to packages/google-vertex to capture the docs nuance for future agents.
  • Local Kage metrics after refresh: 69 files, 751 symbols, 784 calls, 204 tests, 100% indexed coverage, 3 memory packets, 48 memory graph entities, 50 evidence-backed edges, 0 stale packets.

Tests

  • git diff --check

Docs-only change.

@Kage18

Kage18 commented May 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Kage usage for this PR:

This PR fixed #7587 by showing explicit Google Vertex image-provider setup with project and location before calling googleVertex.image(...).

How Kage helped:

  • Scoped recall to the Google Vertex provider docs and package context.
  • Identified the exact target doc: content/providers/01-ai-sdk-providers/16-google-vertex.mdx.
  • Helped keep the fix focused on setup clarity rather than changing provider code.
  • Captured the reusable docs nuance: Vertex image examples should show provider configuration explicitly because project/location are required context for many users.
  • Captured the docs-only verification path: git diff --check.

Why this matters for future sessions:
A future agent editing Vertex docs can recall that image-generation examples should include concrete provider setup, not just the final model call.

Full contribution summary and Kage metrics: kage-core/Kage#8

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Wrong suggested solution for image generation with google

1 participant