Skip to content

fix(web-shared): make encrypted-data blur backwards compatible with Tailwind v3#2108

Merged
mitul-s merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
c+ms/blur-style-prop-1dc2
May 26, 2026
Merged

fix(web-shared): make encrypted-data blur backwards compatible with Tailwind v3#2108
mitul-s merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
c+ms/blur-style-prop-1dc2

Conversation

@mitul-s
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mitul-s mitul-s commented May 25, 2026 •
edited by cursor Bot
Loading

Description

The encrypted-data preview on the run detail panel (EncryptedDataBlock in packages/web-shared/src/components/sidebar/copyable-data-block.tsx) was using the blur-xs utility class. That utility only exists in Tailwind v4 — consumers of @workflow/web-shared who are still on Tailwind v3 see no blur at all on the placeholder, defeating the visual treatment of the encrypted state.

This swaps blur-xs for the arbitrary-value utility blur-[4px] (4px matches v4's blur-xs). Arbitrary values have been supported in Tailwind since v3.0's JIT engine, so the class compiles to filter: blur(4px) on both v3 and v4.

How did you test your changes?

Visual inspection of the decrypt card on the run detail panel — the [encrypted] placeholder still renders blurred and the Decrypt button overlay is unchanged. No JS/CSS behavior change for v4 consumers.

PR Checklist - Required to merge

  • 📦 pnpm changeset was run to create a changelog for this PR
  • 🔒 DCO sign-off passes (run git commit --signoff on your commits)
  • 📝 Ping @vercel/workflow in a comment once the PR is ready, and the above checklist is complete

Slack Thread

Open in Web Open in Cursor 

@cursoragent @mitul-s
fix(web-shared): use inline blur style for tailwind v3 compatibility
a09db93 
Co-authored-by: Mitul Shah <mitulxshah@gmail.com>
@changeset-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changeset-bot Bot commented May 25, 2026 •
edited
Loading

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 950cf21

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 16 packages
Name Type
@workflow/web-shared Patch
@workflow/web Patch
@workflow/cli Patch
workflow Patch
@workflow/world-testing Patch
@workflow/core Patch
@workflow/builders Patch
@workflow/next Patch
@workflow/nitro Patch
@workflow/vitest Patch
@workflow/astro Patch
@workflow/nest Patch
@workflow/rollup Patch
@workflow/sveltekit Patch
@workflow/vite Patch
@workflow/nuxt Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vercel Bot commented May 25, 2026 •
edited
Loading

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 25, 2026 9:13pm
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 25, 2026 9:13pm
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 25, 2026 9:13pm
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 25, 2026 9:13pm
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 25, 2026 9:13pm
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 25, 2026 9:13pm
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 25, 2026 9:13pm
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 25, 2026 9:13pm
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 25, 2026 9:13pm
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 25, 2026 9:13pm
workbench-tanstack-start-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 25, 2026 9:13pm
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 25, 2026 9:13pm
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment, Open in v0 May 25, 2026 9:13pm
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 25, 2026 9:13pm
workflow-tarballs Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 25, 2026 9:13pm
workflow-web Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 25, 2026 9:13pm

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 25, 2026 •
edited
Loading

🧪 E2E Test Results

✅ All tests passed

Summary

Passed Failed Skipped Total
✅ ▲ Vercel Production 1222 0 219 1441
✅ 💻 Local Development 1615 0 219 1834
✅ 📦 Local Production 1615 0 219 1834
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 1615 0 219 1834
✅ 🪟 Windows 131 0 0 131
✅ 📋 Other 741 0 176 917
Total 6939 0 1052 7991

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro 105 0 26
✅ example 105 0 26
✅ express 105 0 26
✅ fastify 105 0 26
✅ hono 105 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack 129 0 2
✅ nextjs-webpack 129 0 2
✅ nitro 105 0 26
✅ nuxt 105 0 26
✅ sveltekit 124 0 7
✅ vite 105 0 26
✅ 💻 Local Development
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 106 0 25
✅ express-stable 106 0 25
✅ fastify-stable 106 0 25
✅ hono-stable 106 0 25
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 112 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled 131 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled 131 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 112 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled 131 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled 131 0 0
✅ nitro-stable 106 0 25
✅ nuxt-stable 106 0 25
✅ sveltekit-stable 125 0 6
✅ vite-stable 106 0 25
✅ 📦 Local Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 106 0 25
✅ express-stable 106 0 25
✅ fastify-stable 106 0 25
✅ hono-stable 106 0 25
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 112 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled 131 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled 131 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 112 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled 131 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled 131 0 0
✅ nitro-stable 106 0 25
✅ nuxt-stable 106 0 25
✅ sveltekit-stable 125 0 6
✅ vite-stable 106 0 25
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 106 0 25
✅ express-stable 106 0 25
✅ fastify-stable 106 0 25
✅ hono-stable 106 0 25
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 112 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled 131 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled 131 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 112 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-disabled 131 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-lazy-discovery-enabled 131 0 0
✅ nitro-stable 106 0 25
✅ nuxt-stable 106 0 25
✅ sveltekit-stable 125 0 6
✅ vite-stable 106 0 25
✅ 🪟 Windows
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 131 0 0
✅ 📋 Other
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable 106 0 25
✅ e2e-local-dev-tanstack-start- 106 0 25
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable 106 0 25
✅ e2e-local-postgres-tanstack-start- 106 0 25
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable 106 0 25
✅ e2e-local-prod-tanstack-start- 106 0 25
✅ e2e-vercel-prod-tanstack-start 105 0 26

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 25, 2026 •
edited
Loading

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Express 0.030s (-32.1% 🟢) 1.005s (~) 0.975s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 0.030s (-29.9% 🟢) 1.005s (~) 0.975s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.046s (-20.2% 🟢) 1.011s (~) 0.965s 10 1.54x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.050s 1.005s 0.956s 10 1.65x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.051s (-47.0% 🟢) 1.013s (-2.9%) 0.962s 10 1.68x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.059s 1.011s 0.952s 10 1.96x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 0.260s (+10.5% 🔺) 2.189s (+2.5%) 1.929s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 0.270s (-34.1% 🟢) 2.182s (-13.0% 🟢) 1.912s 10 1.04x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 0.340s (+35.1% 🔺) 2.573s (+10.3% 🔺) 2.233s 10 1.31x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 1.073s (-5.2% 🟢) 2.005s (~) 0.933s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 1.074s (-4.5%) 2.006s (~) 0.932s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.080s (-5.8% 🟢) 2.009s (~) 0.928s 10 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.087s (-4.6%) 2.009s (~) 0.922s 10 1.01x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.113s 2.006s 0.893s 10 1.04x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.118s 2.010s 0.892s 10 1.04x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 1.575s (-16.0% 🟢) 3.311s (-13.0% 🟢) 1.736s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 1.604s (-58.8% 🟢) 3.182s (-46.2% 🟢) 1.578s 10 1.02x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 1.615s (-20.6% 🟢) 3.667s (-4.3%) 2.052s 10 1.03x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 10.401s (-5.0%) 11.021s (~) 0.619s 3 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 10.403s (-5.1% 🟢) 11.015s (~) 0.612s 3 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 10.422s (-4.1%) 11.020s (~) 0.598s 3 1.00x
💻 Local Express 10.427s (-4.5%) 11.022s (~) 0.596s 3 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 10.680s 11.023s 0.344s 3 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 10.742s 11.018s 0.276s 3 1.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 13.366s (-43.7% 🟢) 14.672s (-41.6% 🟢) 1.306s 3 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 13.834s (-18.5% 🟢) 15.463s (-22.8% 🟢) 1.629s 2 1.03x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 14.111s (-18.5% 🟢) 15.857s (-18.3% 🟢) 1.746s 2 1.06x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 13.448s (-7.8% 🟢) 14.015s (-6.7% 🟢) 0.567s 5 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 13.474s (-10.5% 🟢) 14.025s (-12.5% 🟢) 0.551s 5 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 13.486s (-7.6% 🟢) 14.016s (-6.7% 🟢) 0.530s 5 1.00x
💻 Local Express 13.489s (-9.9% 🟢) 14.027s (-6.7% 🟢) 0.538s 5 1.00x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 14.066s 15.029s 0.963s 4 1.05x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 14.108s 15.017s 0.909s 4 1.05x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 20.520s (-68.2% 🟢) 22.271s (-66.6% 🟢) 1.751s 3 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 22.404s (-57.4% 🟢) 24.565s (-55.0% 🟢) 2.162s 3 1.09x
▲ Vercel Express 23.476s (-53.3% 🟢) 24.915s (-52.6% 🟢) 1.439s 3 1.14x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 11.830s (-15.5% 🟢) 12.017s (-17.6% 🟢) 0.187s 8 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 11.857s (-29.4% 🟢) 12.021s (-29.4% 🟢) 0.164s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 11.928s (-14.6% 🟢) 12.019s (-16.0% 🟢) 0.092s 8 1.01x
💻 Local Express 12.252s (-26.2% 🟢) 12.880s (-24.4% 🟢) 0.628s 7 1.04x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 13.136s 13.742s 0.605s 7 1.11x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 13.342s 14.015s 0.673s 7 1.13x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 31.050s (-92.7% 🟢) 32.614s (-92.3% 🟢) 1.564s 3 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 32.330s (-91.8% 🟢) 34.117s (-91.4% 🟢) 1.787s 3 1.04x
▲ Vercel Express 34.298s (-71.7% 🟢) 35.874s (-71.0% 🟢) 1.576s 3 1.10x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 1.139s (-9.6% 🟢) 2.007s (~) 0.868s 15 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 1.149s (-29.6% 🟢) 2.005s (-3.3%) 0.857s 15 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.162s (-8.8% 🟢) 2.007s (~) 0.845s 15 1.02x
💻 Local Express 1.181s (-20.7% 🟢) 2.006s (~) 0.825s 15 1.04x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.198s 2.007s 0.809s 15 1.05x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.266s 2.006s 0.740s 15 1.11x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.615s (-7.2% 🟢) 4.157s (-3.8%) 1.542s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 2.658s (-7.1% 🟢) 4.123s (-10.8% 🟢) 1.465s 8 1.02x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.490s (+2.7%) 5.168s (+4.8%) 1.678s 6 1.33x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 1.187s (-49.7% 🟢) 2.007s (-33.3% 🟢) 0.820s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.227s (-47.8% 🟢) 2.007s (-33.3% 🟢) 0.781s 15 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.343s 2.007s 0.665s 15 1.13x
💻 Local Nitro 1.594s (-49.3% 🟢) 2.005s (-48.4% 🟢) 0.411s 15 1.34x
💻 Local Express 1.767s (-40.2% 🟢) 2.007s (-41.9% 🟢) 0.240s 15 1.49x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.802s 2.008s 0.205s 15 1.52x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 3.341s (-17.6% 🟢) 4.507s (-23.9% 🟢) 1.166s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 3.426s (-5.3% 🟢) 5.299s (+3.7%) 1.873s 6 1.03x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 4.002s (-43.6% 🟢) 6.299s (-29.3% 🟢) 2.297s 5 1.20x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 1.298s (-62.8% 🟢) 2.009s (-49.9% 🟢) 0.711s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.361s (-60.9% 🟢) 2.009s (-49.9% 🟢) 0.647s 15 1.05x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.603s 2.007s 0.405s 15 1.23x
💻 Local Nitro 4.280s (-48.7% 🟢) 4.726s (-47.6% 🟢) 0.446s 7 3.30x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 4.560s 5.177s 0.617s 6 3.51x
💻 Local Express 5.508s (-33.9% 🟢) 6.013s (-33.4% 🟢) 0.505s 5 4.24x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 6.101s (+73.0% 🔺) 7.747s (+40.0% 🔺) 1.646s 4 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 6.550s (-26.5% 🟢) 8.494s (-22.5% 🟢) 1.943s 4 1.07x
▲ Vercel Express 9.696s (+128.7% 🔺) 11.105s (+81.2% 🔺) 1.410s 3 1.59x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 1.136s (-9.6% 🟢) 2.008s (~) 0.872s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.140s (-9.3% 🟢) 2.009s (~) 0.869s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.215s 2.008s 0.794s 15 1.07x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.314s 2.006s 0.692s 15 1.16x
💻 Local Express 1.396s (-26.3% 🟢) 2.006s (-15.1% 🟢) 0.611s 15 1.23x
💻 Local Nitro 1.410s (-24.4% 🟢) 2.005s (-14.3% 🟢) 0.595s 15 1.24x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.444s (-0.6%) 3.561s (-14.6% 🟢) 1.116s 9 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 2.850s (+10.4% 🔺) 4.042s (-7.1% 🟢) 1.192s 8 1.17x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.996s (+2.2%) 5.142s (+10.8% 🔺) 2.146s 6 1.23x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 1.194s (-49.0% 🟢) 2.008s (-33.3% 🟢) 0.814s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.203s (-48.6% 🟢) 2.009s (-33.3% 🟢) 0.806s 15 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.338s 2.008s 0.670s 15 1.12x
💻 Local Nitro 1.833s (-40.2% 🟢) 2.220s (-42.9% 🟢) 0.387s 14 1.54x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.080s 2.736s 0.656s 11 1.74x
💻 Local Express 2.092s (-33.2% 🟢) 2.507s (-33.4% 🟢) 0.415s 12 1.75x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 4.155s (+30.2% 🔺) 5.681s (+18.6% 🔺) 1.526s 6 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 4.219s (+34.3% 🔺) 5.983s (+32.3% 🔺) 1.764s 6 1.02x
▲ Vercel Nitro 155.569s (+4711.7% 🔺) 157.009s (+2992.5% 🔺) 1.440s 2 37.44x

🔍 Observability: Express | Next.js (Turbopack) | Nitro

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 1.299s (-62.9% 🟢) 2.007s (-49.9% 🟢) 0.709s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.328s (-61.8% 🟢) 2.007s (-49.9% 🟢) 0.679s 15 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.606s 2.008s 0.401s 15 1.24x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 4.838s 5.345s 0.508s 6 3.72x
💻 Local Nitro 4.860s (-46.8% 🟢) 5.345s (-46.7% 🟢) 0.485s 6 3.74x
💻 Local Express 6.498s (-26.2% 🟢) 6.815s (-26.5% 🟢) 0.317s 5 5.00x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 4.766s (-6.4% 🟢) 6.497s (-4.7%) 1.731s 5 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 5.644s (-12.0% 🟢) 7.185s (-12.2% 🟢) 1.540s 5 1.18x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 6.355s (-5.9% 🟢) 7.777s (-9.0% 🟢) 1.422s 4 1.33x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.447s (-45.5% 🟢) 1.007s (~) 0.560s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.468s (-44.2% 🟢) 1.006s (-1.7%) 0.538s 60 1.05x
💻 Local Nitro 0.469s (-52.2% 🟢) 1.004s (-8.2% 🟢) 0.535s 60 1.05x
💻 Local Express 0.473s (-52.0% 🟢) 1.004s (-6.7% 🟢) 0.531s 60 1.06x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.673s 1.006s 0.332s 60 1.51x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.733s 1.004s 0.271s 60 1.64x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 4.739s (-78.5% 🟢) 6.038s (-74.9% 🟢) 1.299s 11 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 6.091s (-68.0% 🟢) 7.501s (-64.8% 🟢) 1.410s 8 1.29x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 6.110s (-57.9% 🟢) 7.822s (-51.4% 🟢) 1.712s 8 1.29x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.014s (-47.4% 🟢) 1.586s (-24.5% 🟢) 0.571s 57 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.066s (-46.1% 🟢) 1.643s (-27.2% 🟢) 0.577s 55 1.05x
💻 Local Nitro 1.175s (-61.3% 🟢) 2.006s (-46.6% 🟢) 0.831s 45 1.16x
💻 Local Express 1.194s (-60.4% 🟢) 2.007s (-44.0% 🟢) 0.813s 45 1.18x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.597s 2.008s 0.411s 45 1.57x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.831s 2.028s 0.197s 45 1.81x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 11.887s (-69.9% 🟢) 13.616s (-67.0% 🟢) 1.729s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 14.753s (-57.3% 🟢) 16.268s (-55.8% 🟢) 1.515s 6 1.24x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 14.769s (-70.3% 🟢) 16.825s (-67.5% 🟢) 2.056s 6 1.24x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 2.059s (-48.4% 🟢) 2.407s (-44.9% 🟢) 0.349s 50 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 2.195s (-46.5% 🟢) 2.798s (-39.2% 🟢) 0.603s 43 1.07x
💻 Local Nitro 2.620s (-71.8% 🟢) 3.057s (-69.5% 🟢) 0.437s 40 1.27x
💻 Local Express 2.693s (-70.8% 🟢) 3.033s (-69.7% 🟢) 0.340s 40 1.31x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 3.159s 4.009s 0.849s 30 1.53x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 3.865s 4.141s 0.276s 30 1.88x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 25.314s (-73.9% 🟢) 27.205s (-72.4% 🟢) 1.890s 5 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 27.692s (-78.7% 🟢) 29.740s (-77.5% 🟢) 2.048s 5 1.09x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 32.069s (-70.1% 🟢) 34.206s (-68.6% 🟢) 2.137s 4 1.27x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 0.172s (-39.0% 🟢) 1.006s (~) 0.833s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.175s (-38.1% 🟢) 1.006s (~) 0.831s 60 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.227s 1.006s 0.779s 60 1.32x
💻 Local Nitro 0.375s (-38.0% 🟢) 1.004s (-1.7%) 0.629s 60 2.17x
💻 Local Express 0.397s (-29.1% 🟢) 1.004s (~) 0.607s 60 2.31x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 0.540s 1.004s 0.464s 60 3.14x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.265s (+36.4% 🔺) 3.782s (+12.9% 🔺) 1.517s 16 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 2.382s (+21.9% 🔺) 3.601s (-1.0%) 1.219s 17 1.05x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 3.060s (+51.3% 🔺) 4.776s (+25.9% 🔺) 1.715s 13 1.35x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 0.285s (-44.0% 🟢) 1.006s (~) 0.721s 90 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.292s (-41.1% 🟢) 1.006s (~) 0.714s 90 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.432s 1.006s 0.574s 90 1.51x
💻 Local Nitro 2.009s (-20.9% 🟢) 2.494s (-17.1% 🟢) 0.485s 37 7.04x
💻 Local Express 2.151s (-14.4% 🟢) 2.736s (-9.1% 🟢) 0.585s 33 7.54x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.207s 2.854s 0.647s 32 7.73x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 4.753s (+47.3% 🔺) 6.171s (+28.0% 🔺) 1.418s 16 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 6.170s (+102.5% 🔺) 7.857s (+63.4% 🔺) 1.686s 12 1.30x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 6.320s (+78.8% 🔺) 7.925s (+52.6% 🔺) 1.605s 12 1.33x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 0.598s (-26.9% 🟢) 1.005s (-1.2%) 0.407s 120 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.628s (-20.5% 🟢) 1.014s (+0.7%) 0.386s 119 1.05x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.895s 1.041s 0.146s 116 1.50x
💻 Local Nitro 8.995s (-19.6% 🟢) 9.567s (-18.0% 🟢) 0.572s 13 15.04x
💻 Local Express 9.991s (-10.7% 🟢) 10.530s (-11.8% 🟢) 0.539s 12 16.70x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 10.515s 11.027s 0.512s 11 17.58x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 13.489s (+74.7% 🔺) 14.987s (+59.4% 🔺) 1.499s 9 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 15.828s (+113.3% 🔺) 17.471s (+89.0% 🔺) 1.643s 8 1.17x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 18.071s (+75.0% 🔺) 20.385s (+65.9% 🔺) 2.314s 7 1.34x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

Stream Benchmarks (includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 1.117s (+422.6% 🔺) 2.005s (+99.6% 🔺) 0.010s (-23.2% 🟢) 2.016s (+97.9% 🔺) 0.900s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.122s (+447.1% 🔺) 2.003s (+100.6% 🔺) 0.001s (-37.5% 🟢) 2.010s (+98.7% 🔺) 0.888s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.145s (+458.4% 🔺) 2.002s (+100.3% 🔺) 0.002s (+6.7% 🔺) 2.009s (+98.7% 🔺) 0.865s 10 1.03x
💻 Local Express 1.158s (+481.6% 🔺) 2.005s (+99.6% 🔺) 0.013s (+5.8% 🔺) 2.020s (+98.4% 🔺) 0.862s 10 1.04x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.176s 2.003s 0.010s 2.017s 0.841s 10 1.05x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.213s 2.002s 0.001s 2.010s 0.797s 10 1.09x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.152s (-43.8% 🟢) 3.134s (-40.6% 🟢) 1.841s (+148.1% 🔺) 5.340s (-17.6% 🟢) 3.188s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 2.557s (+2.1%) 3.179s (-22.3% 🟢) 2.754s (+186.7% 🔺) 6.560s (+17.3% 🔺) 4.003s 10 1.19x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 2.780s (-59.4% 🟢) 3.555s (-58.9% 🟢) 2.085s (+230.0% 🔺) 6.401s (-34.6% 🟢) 3.621s 10 1.29x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 1.503s (+138.6% 🔺) 2.003s (+99.0% 🔺) 0.004s (+5.3% 🔺) 2.025s (+98.0% 🔺) 0.522s 30 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.516s (+142.9% 🔺) 2.000s (+98.6% 🔺) 0.004s (-4.1%) 2.025s (+98.0% 🔺) 0.509s 30 1.01x
💻 Local Express 1.535s (+102.8% 🔺) 2.012s (+95.5% 🔺) 0.010s (+6.6% 🔺) 2.023s (+94.6% 🔺) 0.488s 30 1.02x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.669s 2.009s 0.009s 2.021s 0.352s 30 1.11x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.670s 2.010s 0.004s 2.025s 0.355s 30 1.11x
💻 Local Nitro 1.687s (+101.1% 🔺) 2.011s (+98.7% 🔺) 0.010s (+5.2% 🔺) 2.201s (+97.3% 🔺) 0.514s 28 1.12x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 5.824s (-80.2% 🟢) 6.982s (-77.3% 🟢) 0.209s (+86.6% 🔺) 7.664s (-75.9% 🟢) 1.840s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 5.981s (-8.0% 🟢) 7.379s (-7.9% 🟢) 0.206s (-49.7% 🟢) 7.960s (-9.9% 🟢) 1.979s 8 1.03x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 5.996s (-64.6% 🟢) 7.395s (-59.5% 🟢) 0.278s (+31.6% 🔺) 8.160s (-56.9% 🟢) 2.164s 8 1.03x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.643s (-33.6% 🟢) 1.048s (-16.0% 🟢) 0.000s (+24.1% 🔺) 1.058s (-15.9% 🟢) 0.415s 58 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.650s (-32.3% 🟢) 1.030s (-19.4% 🟢) 0.000s (+58.6% 🔺) 1.046s (-19.9% 🟢) 0.396s 58 1.01x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 0.759s 1.072s 0.000s 1.078s 0.320s 56 1.18x
💻 Local Nitro 1.308s (+7.0% 🔺) 2.013s (~) 0.000s (-33.3% 🟢) 2.015s (~) 0.707s 30 2.03x
💻 Local Express 1.336s (+9.1% 🔺) 2.015s (~) 0.000s (-10.0% 🟢) 2.017s (~) 0.681s 30 2.08x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 1.643s 2.013s 0.000s 2.196s 0.552s 28 2.55x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 3.525s (+15.5% 🔺) 4.731s (+7.7% 🔺) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 5.127s (+6.6% 🔺) 1.602s 12 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 3.984s (+6.5% 🔺) 5.405s (+5.9% 🔺) 0.000s (-50.0% 🟢) 5.797s (+4.8%) 1.814s 11 1.13x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 4.120s (-59.5% 🟢) 5.733s (-50.2% 🟢) 0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺) 6.235s (-48.3% 🟢) 2.116s 10 1.17x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express | Next.js (Turbopack)

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Express 1.255s (-29.2% 🟢) 1.903s (-12.6% 🟢) 0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺) 1.915s (-12.9% 🟢) 0.661s 32 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.280s (-28.5% 🟢) 2.029s (-5.2% 🟢) 0.000s (+86.7% 🔺) 2.061s (-5.2% 🟢) 0.781s 30 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Next.js (Turbopack) 1.632s 2.262s 0.000s 2.269s 0.637s 27 1.30x
💻 Local Nitro 2.949s (-13.0% 🟢) 3.610s (-10.5% 🟢) 0.000s (-77.9% 🟢) 3.617s (-10.4% 🟢) 0.668s 17 2.35x
💻 Local Next.js (Turbopack) 2.952s 3.467s 0.001s 3.478s 0.526s 18 2.35x
💻 Local Express 3.123s (-9.9% 🟢) 4.030s (~) 0.000s (-41.7% 🟢) 4.032s (~) 0.910s 15 2.49x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 5.191s (+26.8% 🔺) 6.338s (+17.9% 🔺) 0.000s (-59.3% 🟢) 6.697s (+15.6% 🔺) 1.505s 9 1.00x
▲ Vercel Next.js (Turbopack) 5.792s (+3.1%) 7.750s (+11.0% 🔺) 0.001s (+500.0% 🔺) 8.205s (+8.8% 🔺) 2.413s 8 1.12x
▲ Vercel Express 5.960s (+29.9% 🔺) 6.976s (+15.8% 🔺) 0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺) 7.349s (+13.8% 🔺) 1.388s 9 1.15x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Next.js (Turbopack) | Express

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World 🥇 Fastest Framework Wins
💻 Local Nitro 17/21
🐘 Postgres Express 18/21
▲ Vercel Nitro 18/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework 🥇 Fastest World Wins
Express 🐘 Postgres 19/21
Next.js (Turbopack) 🐘 Postgres 14/21
Nitro 🐘 Postgres 14/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis + BullMQ: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Cloudflare: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MySQL: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Azure: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 NATS JetStream: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Upstash: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run

@cursoragent @mitul-s
fix(web-shared): use blur-[4px] arbitrary value for tailwind v3/v4 co…
950cf21 
…mpat

Co-authored-by: Mitul Shah <mitulxshah@gmail.com>
@mitul-s mitul-s marked this pull request as ready for review May 26, 2026 16:49
@mitul-s mitul-s requested a review from a team as a code owner May 26, 2026 16:49
@mitul-s mitul-s enabled auto-merge (squash) May 26, 2026 16:49
@mitul-s mitul-s merged commit 8633ebb into main May 26, 2026
194 of 209 checks passed
@mitul-s mitul-s deleted the c+ms/blur-style-prop-1dc2 branch May 26, 2026 17:04
@github-actions github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request May 26, 2026
Open
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 26, 2026

No backport to stable for 8633ebb (AI decision).

The EncryptedDataBlock component being fixed does not exist on stable — that file's stable version has no blur-xs usage and no encrypted data preview. This fix builds on main-only behavior, so there is nothing to backport.

To override, re-run the Backport to stable workflow manually via workflow_dispatch and paste this commit SHA into the ref input:

8633ebb9b32f28cce4344329840aca47e22d3197

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@karthikscale3 karthikscale3 karthikscale3 approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@mitul-s @karthikscale3 @cursoragent