Skip to content

Release v3.0.4: fix release automation#28

Merged
vib795 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
release-3.0.4
Jun 6, 2026
Merged

Release v3.0.4: fix release automation#28
vib795 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
release-3.0.4

Conversation

@vib795
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@vib795 vib795 commented Jun 6, 2026

Fixes the two release-pipeline bugs found while shipping v3.0.3, and bumps to v3.0.4 so the corrected flow is exercised end-to-end on merge.

Fixes

  • auto-tag.yml — a tag pushed with GITHUB_TOKEN does not fire release.yml's on: push: tags trigger (GitHub blocks recursive event triggering), so releases never auto-started. Now explicitly dispatches release.yml via gh workflow run (workflow_dispatch is exempt from that restriction). Adds actions: write permission.
  • release.ymlResolve tag used ${GITHUB_REF_NAME:-inputs.tag}, which on workflow_dispatch resolves to the branch (master) and fails the version-match check. Now uses inputs.tag || ref_name.

Expected post-merge behavior

Merge → auto-tag creates v3.0.4 and dispatches release.yml → release builds the .vsix + GitHub Release automatically (no manual tag re-push). Marketplace publish remains the manual vsce step by design.

No src/ changes — extension bundle is functionally identical to 3.0.3.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Two CI fixes so version-bump pushes release end-to-end without manual tag re-pushing:

- auto-tag.yml: a tag pushed with GITHUB_TOKEN does not fire the Release
  workflow's `on: push: tags` trigger (GitHub blocks recursive event
  triggering). Explicitly dispatch release.yml via `gh workflow run`
  (workflow_dispatch is exempt from that restriction; needs actions: write).
- release.yml: the "Resolve tag" step used ${GITHUB_REF_NAME:-inputs.tag},
  which on workflow_dispatch resolves to the branch (master), failing the
  version-match check. Prefer the explicit input: inputs.tag || ref_name.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 6, 2026

Warning

Review limit reached

@vib795, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 51 minutes. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 97340d38-ae99-49cd-9229-03a7b4f6e0b4

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5fc4931 and 5ba3926.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/auto-tag.yml
  • .github/workflows/release.yml
  • package.json
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch release-3.0.4

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@vib795 vib795 merged commit 4df308a into master Jun 6, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant