Skip to content

Update dependency vitest to v3.2.7#34

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
devfrom
renovate/vitest-monorepo
Open

Update dependency vitest to v3.2.7#34
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
devfrom
renovate/vitest-monorepo

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
vitest (source) 3.2.43.2.7 age confidence

Release Notes

vitest-dev/vitest (vitest)

v3.2.7

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
  • browser: Check fs access in builtin commands [backport to v3]  -  by @​hi-ogawa, Hiroshi Ogawa and OpenCode (claude-opus-4-8) in #​10679 (b795e)
    View changes on GitHub

v3.2.6

Compare Source

v3.2.5

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot changed the title Update dependency vitest to v3.2.6 Update vitest monorepo to v3.2.6 Jun 2, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title Update vitest monorepo to v3.2.6 Update vitest monorepo Jun 22, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title Update vitest monorepo Update dependency vitest to v3.2.6 Jun 25, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot changed the title Update dependency vitest to v3.2.6 Update dependency vitest to v3.2.7 Jul 6, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/vitest-monorepo branch from efca8c2 to f997975 Compare July 6, 2026 11:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants