Use bootstrap 5.3.1 for js-console-validation-result-table attachment

[uarlouski]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated styling framework dependency to a newer version for enhanced browser compatibility and improved performance.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 19598e2a-3b5e-4f92-970b-2dd63cdd822f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3474c94 and 4439ce6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• vividus-plugin-web-app/src/main/resources/org/vividus/steps/ui/web/js-console-validation-result-table.ftl

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updates the Bootstrap CSS dependency in a JavaScript console validation result template from version 3.4.1 to 5.3.1 by changing the stylesheet link URL.

Changes

Bootstrap CSS Version Update

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Bootstrap stylesheet reference update vividus-plugin-web-app/src/main/resources/org/vividus/steps/ui/web/js-console-validation-result-table.ftl	The HTML <link> element for Bootstrap CSS is updated to load version 5.3.1 from webjars instead of 3.4.1.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• vividus-framework/vividus#6672: Updates Bootstrap CSS from 3.4.1 to 5.3.1 in a different FTL result-table template.
• vividus-framework/vividus#6674: Updates Bootstrap CSS from 3.4.1 to 5.3.1 in another FTL template asset.
• vividus-framework/vividus#6673: Upgrades Bootstrap from 3.4.1 to 5.3.1 in another FreeMarker web template.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The pull request title accurately describes the main change: updating Bootstrap CSS from version 3.4.1 to 5.3.1 in the js-console-validation-result-table template.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch vividus-plugin-web-app

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.79%. Comparing base (3474c94) to head (4439ce6).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #6676   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     97.79%   97.79%           
  Complexity     7325     7325           
=========================================
  Files          1015     1015           
  Lines         21508    21508           
  Branches       1416     1416           
=========================================
  Hits          21033    21033           
  Misses          359      359           
  Partials        116      116           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-actions]

Qodana for JVM

It seems all right 👌

No new problems were found according to the checks applied

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked
☁️ View the detailed Qodana report

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at qodana-support@jetbrains.com

• Or via our issue tracker: https://jb.gg/qodana-issue
• Or share your feedback: https://jb.gg/qodana-discussions