Rename CI job to checks with a stable display name#2
Conversation
The job key said 'test' but no test suite runs — it's lint, format, and typecheck. The explicit display name decouples the ruleset's required-check context from the YAML key.
Greptile SummaryThis PR updates the GitHub Actions CI job naming. The main changes are:
Confidence Score: 5/5Safe to merge with minimal risk. The change is limited to a GitHub Actions job identifier and explicit display name while preserving the existing workflow steps. No files require special attention.
What T-Rex did
Important Files Changed
Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "Rename CI job: checks with stable displa..." | Re-trigger Greptile |
|
Thanks @greptile-apps — confirmed. The change is scoped to the CI job identifier ( |
|
Acknowledged — thanks for the confirmation. The rename makes sense as a quality-of-life improvement: decoupling the ruleset's required-check context from the YAML job key means future job-key renames won't silently break branch protection. The |
Follow-up from the pre-public audit: the CI job was keyed
testbut runs no tests (it runs lint, format check, and typecheck). This renames the key tochecksand pins an explicit display nameCI, decoupling the branch ruleset's required-check context from the YAML key so future job-key renames can't silently break merge requirements.Paired change (applied on the ruleset side alongside this PR): the Main branch protection ruleset's required status check context changes
test→CI.Devin shepherd: https://app.devin.ai/sessions/53aea6d91c084725a3f62734cbc26a43