New Naming Convention#1
New Naming Convention#1JulianKahnert wants to merge 4 commits intoworldiety:masterfrom JulianKahnert:naming-changes
Conversation
|
Good work, but k8s is a bit bitchy about names (and oddly enough contrary to RFC-1123). So here are a few considerations:
I can't recall why and if we need to |
|
More considerations: As written here, names are obligated to:
This has to be somehow guaranteed by |
|
Thanks for your feedback! Any other considerations? |
|
In order to merge this we need a way to redeploy and clean all namespaces that are managed by autocd, also this is quite a big change in a fundamental way autocd works, I'd only be comfortable merging if we can test this extensively with some edgecases @JulianKahnert |
Hi,
I wanted to improve the readability of the Pods/Services etc. and skip the lookups of hashes when debugging or looking at the monitoring system.
I did not changed the
getPVCNamemethod, because that might break the StatefulSets, right!?Do you think that we can use this as a drop in replacement or do the changes break a deployment?