Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a good fix for the common case. However, this regex can still misidentify a query if there is a SQL comment between
REPLACEand the opening parenthesis.For example, a query like
SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE col = REPLACE/* a comment */('a', 'b');would be incorrectly flagged as a write query.The negative lookahead
(?!\s*\()doesn't account for comments. As a result,REPLACEis matched, and the bug's symptom (swallowingSELECToutput) would persist for this edge case.Handling all SQL comment styles (
--,#,/* ... */) could make the regex very complex. It's a trade-off between correctness for all edge cases and regex simplicity. Given the context, you might decide the current level of fix is sufficient, but I wanted to point out this remaining scenario.