Skip to content

CVE-2012-5783: Justification#227

Open
kavindasr wants to merge 2 commits into
wso2:mainfrom
kavindasr:CVE-2012-5783
Open

CVE-2012-5783: Justification#227
kavindasr wants to merge 2 commits into
wso2:mainfrom
kavindasr:CVE-2012-5783

Conversation

@kavindasr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

$Subject

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: d29c8658-9c3b-4149-85b1-e6cf31ef3cd9

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b966f1b and 17a1f76.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • en/docs/security-announcements/cve-justifications/2026/CVE-2012-5783.md
  • en/docs/security-announcements/cve-justifications/2026/index.md
  • en/mkdocs.yml
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • en/docs/security-announcements/cve-justifications/2026/CVE-2012-5783.md
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • en/docs/security-announcements/cve-justifications/2026/index.md

📝 Walkthrough

Added a new justification page and index entry for the 2026 publication year, and updated the main navigation to surface the new content under the CVE justifications section. The new page documents the rationale for the affected product set and notes that no further action is required.

Walkthrough

This pull request adds a new CVE justification document for CVE-2012-5783, dated July 8, 2026, stating no customer action is required and detailing affected WSO2 products (versions 3.1.0–4.7.0). It explains that WSO2's Apache Commons HttpClient fork already implements SSL server hostname verification, concluding no dependency upgrade is needed. The document is linked from the 2026 CVE justifications index page and mkdocs.yml navigation.

Suggested reviewers: ayomawdb, 1uffyD9, tgtshanika

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description is only a placeholder and omits the required template sections. Replace the placeholder with the full template, including Purpose, Goals, Approach, Release note, Documentation, and Security checks.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly names the CVE and indicates the justification change.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@ayomawdb

ayomawdb commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kavindasr Justifications are nested inside folder created for the publication year.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants