Raise overall coverage to 85 percent#11
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly boosts the overall test coverage of the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Good progress reaching 85% statement coverage. The test infrastructure helpers ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request significantly increases test coverage across various architectures and components of the translator, which is a great improvement. The new tests are comprehensive and cover many edge cases. I've found one potential issue in a test where an llvm.Module is reused across sub-tests, which could lead to test interference. I've left a comment with a suggestion to address this. Overall, this is a high-quality contribution.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #11 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 31.42% 69.48% +38.06%
===========================================
Files 57 57
Lines 16380 16380
===========================================
+ Hits 5147 11382 +6235
+ Misses 10365 3683 -6682
- Partials 868 1315 +447
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Summary
ok github.com/goplus/plan9asm/cmd/plan9asmscan 1.548s statement coverage to 85.0%
Verification
ok github.com/goplus/plan9asm/cmd/plan9asmscan (cached)
ok github.com/goplus/plan9asm/cmd/plan9asmscan 1.119s coverage: 88.4% of statements