Open
Conversation
|
Hi Igor, at least one memory leak is because at line 331, in tcl_eval( ), the function returns without freeing the variable list. Need to add tcl_list_free(list) before the return. |
Contributor
This comment was marked as a violation of GitHub Acceptable Use Policies
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I would like to use your partcl in my embedded projects so I have written malloc for this program in order to remove more dependencies and run it on bare metal. But I found out that your program does not always use free() correctly. Sometimes it does not use correct pointer to allocated memory when uses "subst". Furthermore I could not find where your fault really is. My implementation of free() named "sfree()" prints "free called" when it is really called and prints "FREE ERROR", when it cannot recognize what is the pointer it received. Just type "make|less" to see this. Maybe you can find this mistake?
There is also another problem: partcl does not verify if malloc returns NULL pointer. Maybe it is a good idea to run "exit(1);" from custom malloc/realloc instead of returning NULL.