[No QA] Docs updates for E/A#91652 Add untagged expense search example#91972
Draft
MelvinBot wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
[No QA] Docs updates for E/A#91652 Add untagged expense search example#91972MelvinBot wants to merge 1 commit into
MelvinBot wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Add an example showing how to use -has:tag to find expenses without tags in the search operators help article. Co-authored-by: KJ21-ENG <KJ21-ENG@users.noreply.github.com>
MelvinBot
added
the
HelpDot
51 tasks
github-actions
Bot
changed the title
Contributor
|
A preview of your ExpensifyHelp changes have been deployed to https://c1074d50.helpdot.pages.dev ⚡️ Updated articles: |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
-has:tagexample to the search operators help article, showing users how to find expenses without tags-has:taginstead of the brokentag:nonequeryRelated PR
#91652
@KJ21-ENG, please review the files changed and confirm they reflect the current behavior. Then mark this PR
Ready for review.