Skip to content

feat: Document support for brotli compression#2750

Open
mixalturek wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
brotli-compression
Open

feat: Document support for brotli compression#2750
mixalturek wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
brotli-compression

Conversation

@mixalturek

@mixalturek mixalturek commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
  • https://github.com/apify/apify-core/pull/28971 added support for brotli compression to BE.
  • Key value store endpoints didn't support it recently. I guess this was a bug in doc, but it's all good now :-)
  • Dataset items endpoints support it as well now.
  • I put brotli at the beginning of the lists, it should be the first choice whenever possible.

Related PRs

- apify/apify-core#28971 added support for brotli compression to BE.
- Key value store endpoints didn't support it recently. I guess this was a bug in doc, but it's all good now :-)
- Dataset items endpoints support it as well now.
- I put brotli at the beginning of the lists, it should be the first choice whenever possible.
@apify-service-account

apify-service-account commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✅ Preview for this PR (commit 2b98036) is ready at https://pr-2750.preview.docs.apify.com (see action run).

@apify-service-account

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Action required@mixalturek please coordinate this docs PR with the Python API client PR linked below.

Because this PR modifies the OpenAPI specification, the generated models in apify-client-python must be regenerated to stay in sync. This has already been done automatically:

A companion PR has been opened in apify-client-python with the regenerated models: apify/apify-client-python#928

  • Please make sure to review and merge both PRs together to keep the OpenAPI spec and API clients in sync.
  • You can ask for review and help from the Tooling team if needed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants