Add and improve translator comments and tooltips for peers tab address fields

[jonatack]

Per translator feedback in this thread: #526 (comment)

"The lack of string context in Transifex is a real problem for this project, as proper context (dev notes and/or screenshots) are essential to achieve quality translations."

This pull adds developer notes for transifex translators via extracomment tags, and it improves the existing ones and their tooltips with more context, clarity and completeness for the following peer tab fields as a follow-up to #526:

• address relay
• addresses processed
• addressed rate-limited

It looks like only six lines of diff, but they are loooong lines.

If this is the right direction, the same can be done for other fields in follow-ups.

[promag]

Concept ACK, seems to be in line with what was suggested/requested.

[jonatack]

Updated per @promag feedback (thanks!)

[jarolrod]

ACK bcd72ef

I've been collecting thoughts on how to formulate translator comments here and the translator comments introduced here tick the boxes.

in reference to the translator comment documentation I've prepared: in 1df9daa you allude to what the value of the field is, I wonder if I should include that point as required context in the doc.

If you retouch, and definitely not necessary, you could rename the PR to Add and improve peers tab address translator comments and tooltips and similarly update the commits to state they are updating translator comments instead of extracomment.

[jonatack]

ACK bcd72ef

in reference to the translator comment documentation I've prepared: in 1df9daa you allude to what the value of the field is, I wonder if I should include that point as required context in the doc.

Describing the value(s) of the field where relevant and helpful seems like a good idea. (Nice doc BTW.)

If you retouch, and definitely not necessary, you could rename the PR to Add and improve peers tab address translator comments and tooltips and similarly update the commits to state they are updating translator comments instead of extracomment.

Done!

[jarolrod]

re-ACK 4d2b503

Thanks for picking up the suggestions!

[hebasto]

ACK 4d2b503, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.