OCPBUGS-84691: prom rules: add alert for nodes using runc#5874
OCPBUGS-84691: prom rules: add alert for nodes using runc#5874haircommander wants to merge 2 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
Conversation
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: LGTM mode |
|
@haircommander: This pull request references OCPNODE-4446 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "5.0.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
WalkthroughAdded a new Prometheus alert group Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 12✅ Passed checks (12 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
7e20fb5 to
83a3aea
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@install/0000_90_machine-config_01_prometheus-rules.yaml`:
- Around line 29-30: Fix the grammar typo in the Prometheus alert rule
description: update the description field value (the YAML key "description" in
the rule) to change “support will removed” to “support will be removed” so the
user-facing message reads correctly.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 199b41d8-1f05-4044-a1a5-3bacba2e627a
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
install/0000_90_machine-config_01_prometheus-rules.yaml
|
@haircommander: This pull request references OCPNODE-4382 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target the "5.0.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@haircommander: This pull request references OCPNODE-4383 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "5.0.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Caution Failed to replace (edit) comment. This is likely due to insufficient permissions or the comment being deleted. Error details |
f3b80b8 to
ee72fc1
Compare
|
/retest |
1 similar comment
|
/retest |
relies on a cri-o metric that's emitted when the cluster is using runc Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <pehunt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <pehunt@redhat.com>
ee72fc1 to
6c48b96
Compare
yuqi-zhang
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overall seems fine, just some questions in line
|
@haircommander: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-84691, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@haircommander: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-84691, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Scheduling tests matching the |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: haircommander, yuqi-zhang The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@haircommander: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
relies on a cri-o metric that's emitted when the cluster is using runc
generated with claude
Summary by CodeRabbit