Rollup of 9 pull requests

[matthiaskrgr]

Successful merges:

• Make must_not_suspend lint see through references when drop tracking is enabled #97962 (Make must_not_suspend lint see through references when drop tracking is enabled)
• avoid assertion failures in try_to_scalar_int #99966 (avoid assertion failures in try_to_scalar_int)
• Improving Fuchsia rustc support documentation #100637 (Improving Fuchsia rustc support documentation)
• Point at a type parameter shadowing another type #100643 (Point at a type parameter shadowing another type)
• Migrations for rustc_expand transcribe.rs #100651 (Migrations for rustc_expand transcribe.rs)
• Attribute cleanups #100669 (Attribute cleanups)
• Fix documentation of rustc_parse::parser::Parser::parse_stmt_without_recovery #100670 (Fix documentation of rustc_parse::parser::Parser::parse_stmt_without_recovery)
• Migrate lint reports in typeck::check_unused to LintDiagnostic #100674 (Migrate lint reports in typeck::check_unused to LintDiagnostic)
• ty::Error does not match other types for region constraints #100688 (ty::Error does not match other types for region constraints)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

[matthiaskrgr]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=10

[bors]

📌 Commit c7a4942 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit c7a4942 with merge f241c0c...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing f241c0c to master...

[rust-timer]

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Perf Build Sha
#100688	59b6e3204a715ef5451f09f263ba23a3785a0b86
#100674	e5ca14b2427e1000609d9a8c8d82011954d02ca7
#100670	7051e23268714b10bedc1db65ff96d70d71292fb
#100669	26298ee1e7a1ff8b24db0dbb551038f76eb9292b
#100651	4b8402049f644ec0acf00299fccef11a0c5f3c22
#100643	6df29f6da9352d377079aff25fb53d5a27ea801e
#100637	95ba8b46ca068d66988649f6d06e39e4fbd55956
#99966	861dd84b24ddfd890d1e40f875ba949764ae3e51
#97962	e410a7be47d1c2f1092c4c815243179db1255b62

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (f241c0c): comparison url.

Instruction count

• Primary benchmarks: ❌ relevant regressions found
• Secondary benchmarks: no relevant changes found

	mean1	max	count2
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.9%	0.9%	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.9%	0.9%	2

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

• Primary benchmarks: ✅ relevant improvements found
• Secondary benchmarks: mixed results

	mean1	max	count2
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.3%	2.4%	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.9%	-1.9%	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.0%	-2.8%	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.9%	-1.9%	2

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Footnotes

1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change ↩ ↩²

2. number of relevant changes ↩ ↩²