bootstrap: print{ln}! -> eprint{ln}! (take 2)#134040
Merged
bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom Dec 10, 2024
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
Some changes occurred in src/tools/compiletest cc @jieyouxu This PR modifies If appropriate, please update |
clubby789
commented
Dec 8, 2024
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
b097197 to
eddf6f0
Compare
Member
|
Rebased to fix merge conflict, no functional changes. |
Co-authored-by: Jieyou Xu <jieyouxu@outlook.com>
eddf6f0 to
a6c4628
Compare
Member
|
Fixed a missing conversion in compiletest if self.config.mode == crate::common::Mode::Ui {
- println!("note: by default, ui tests are expected not to compile");
+ eprintln!("note: by default, ui tests are expected not to compile");
} |
jieyouxu
approved these changes
Dec 9, 2024
Member
jieyouxu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks! I did some local testing
./x clean: OK- Basic compiler flow:
./x build library: OK - Library test flow:
./x test library/alloc: OK - Check compiler flow:
./x check compiler: OK - Stage 1 ui test flow (no changes): OK
- Stage 1 ui test failure flow: OK
- stderr diff changed: OK
- rebless: OK
- Stage 1 run-make: OK
./x run src/tools/unicode-table-generator/: OK
AFAICT this looks fine to me.
Member
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2024
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#133996 (Move most tests for `-l` and `#[link(..)]` into `tests/ui/link-native-libs`) - rust-lang#134012 (Grammar fixes) - rust-lang#134032 (docs: better examples for `std::ops::ControlFlow`) - rust-lang#134040 (bootstrap: print{ln}! -> eprint{ln}! (take 2)) - rust-lang#134043 (Add test to check unicode identifier version) - rust-lang#134053 (rustdoc: rename `issue-\d+.rs` tests to have meaningful names (part 10)) - rust-lang#134055 (interpret: clean up deduplicating allocation functions) - rust-lang#134073 (dataflow_const_prop: do not eval a ptr address in SwitchInt) - rust-lang#134084 (Fix typo in RFC mention 3598 -> 3593) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134040 - clubby789:bootstrap-eprintln, r=jieyouxu bootstrap: print{ln}! -> eprint{ln}! (take 2) r? `@jieyouxu` Reland of rust-lang#133817 with the `print!`s changed as well.
fmease
added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2024
…lubby789 bootstrap: Forward cargo JSON output to stdout, not stderr This fixes the RA errors I've been seeing on proc-macros after the re-landing of rust-lang#134040. r? clubby789
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134123 - Zalathar:json-output, r=jieyouxu,clubby789 bootstrap: Forward cargo JSON output to stdout, not stderr This fixes the RA errors I've been seeing on proc-macros after the re-landing of rust-lang#134040. r? clubby789
Member
|
This ended up causing problems with rust-analyzer that were (hopefully) fixed by #134123. |
This was referenced Dec 12, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2024
Revert "bootstrap: print{ln}! -> eprint{ln}! (take 2) rust-lang#134040"
Unfortunately, rust-lang#134040 is proving to have caused more output interleaving problems that are tricky to diagnose and fix, and I think we probably should leave these untouched as bootstrap and compiletest has a bunch of interconnecting parts, and the commands and tools that they exercise do not consistently use stderr/stdout either. This causes hard-to-diagnose output interleaving bugs, which unfortunately degrades contributor experience.
This PR reverts two PRs in order to cleanly revert rust-lang#134040:
1. Revert rust-lang#134123 which is a fix-forward after rust-lang#134040.
2. Revert rust-lang#134040 itself.
I don't regret the initial effort `@clubby789,` and thank you for making the attempts, but I think we need to refrain from touching too many of these at once because some of the interleaving are very non-obvious and we don't have test coverage for.
r? `@clubby789`
cc `@Zalathar`
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2024
Revert "bootstrap: print{ln}! -> eprint{ln}! (take 2) rust-lang#134040"
Unfortunately, rust-lang#134040 is proving to have caused more output interleaving problems that are tricky to diagnose and fix, and I think we probably should leave these untouched as bootstrap and compiletest has a bunch of interconnecting parts, and the commands and tools that they exercise do not consistently use stderr/stdout either. This causes hard-to-diagnose output interleaving bugs, which unfortunately degrades contributor experience.
This PR reverts two PRs in order to cleanly revert rust-lang#134040:
1. Revert rust-lang#134123 which is a fix-forward after rust-lang#134040.
2. Revert rust-lang#134040 itself.
I don't regret the initial effort `@clubby789,` and thank you for making the attempts, but I think we need to refrain from touching too many of these at once because some of the interleaving are very non-obvious and we don't have test coverage for.
r? `@clubby789`
cc `@Zalathar`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#133122 (Add unpolished, experimental support for AFIDT (async fn in dyn trait)) - rust-lang#133249 (ABI checks: add support for loongarch) - rust-lang#134089 (Use newly added exceptions to non default branch warning) - rust-lang#134188 (Bump Fuchsia) - rust-lang#134204 (Fix our `llvm::Bool` typedef to be signed, to match `LLVMBool`) - rust-lang#134207 (Revert "bootstrap: print{ln}! -> eprint{ln}! (take 2) rust-lang#134040") - rust-lang#134214 (rustdoc: fix self cmp) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134207 - jieyouxu:revert-134040, r=lqd Revert "bootstrap: print{ln}! -> eprint{ln}! (take 2) rust-lang#134040" Unfortunately, rust-lang#134040 is proving to have caused more output interleaving problems that are tricky to diagnose and fix, and I think we probably should leave these untouched as bootstrap and compiletest has a bunch of interconnecting parts, and the commands and tools that they exercise do not consistently use stderr/stdout either. This causes hard-to-diagnose output interleaving bugs, which unfortunately degrades contributor experience. This PR reverts two PRs in order to cleanly revert rust-lang#134040: 1. Revert rust-lang#134123 which is a fix-forward after rust-lang#134040. 2. Revert rust-lang#134040 itself. I don't regret the initial effort `@clubby789,` and thank you for making the attempts, but I think we need to refrain from touching too many of these at once because some of the interleaving are very non-obvious and we don't have test coverage for. r? `@clubby789` cc `@Zalathar`
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
r? @jieyouxu
Reland of #133817 with the
print!s changed as well.