Conversation
|
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
|
⌛ Trying commit 3a96140 with merge f49484f1a882c6384f1f0a464c45617920af84d2... |
|
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
|
@bors r+ rollup=never (just in case, as this pulls in a few more commits than usual) The only other backport we need that I'm aware of is https://reviews.llvm.org/D99469, and that one hasn't landed upstream yet. |
|
📌 Commit 3a96140 has been approved by |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
https://reviews.llvm.org/rG1c268a8ff4e90a85d0e634350b1104080614cf2b was one of the backport candidates I had in mind. Looks like it didn't make v12.0.0 so will have to backport it to both nightly and beta. |
|
We discussed this in the compiler team triage meeting this morning and decided to approve the backport. I see a beta PR (#84271) has already been opened so I will leave the approval tag on that PR. |
Since LLVM 12 (rust-lang/rust#84230) ExceptionStackFrame has to be taken by value. See rust-lang/rust#40180 (comment).
Since LLVM 12 (rust-lang/rust#84230) ExceptionStackFrame has to be taken by value. See rust-lang/rust#40180 (comment).
Since LLVM 12 (rust-lang/rust#84230) ExceptionStackFrame has to be taken by value. See rust-lang/rust#40180 (comment).
Since LLVM 12 (rust-lang/rust#84230) ExceptionStackFrame has to be taken by value. See rust-lang/rust#40180 (comment).
Since LLVM 12 (rust-lang/rust#84230) ExceptionStackFrame has to be taken by value. See rust-lang/rust#40180 (comment).
No description provided.