add BinaryHeap::try_reserve and BinaryHeap::try_reserve_exact#91529
Merged
bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom Dec 14, 2021
Merged
add BinaryHeap::try_reserve and BinaryHeap::try_reserve_exact#91529bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
r? @yaahc (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
TennyZhuang
force-pushed
the
try_reserve_binary_heap
branch
2 times, most recently
from
35e8e1c to
a434385
Compare
This was referenced Dec 5, 2021
Contributor
Author
|
@rustbot label: +T-libs-api |
rustbot
added
the
T-libs-api
Contributor
|
I think this PR should be part of #48043 |
Contributor
Author
But the feature was stabilized in 1.57.0, we need another feature gate. |
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2021
…scottmcm Suggest try_reserve in try_reserve_exact During developing rust-lang#91529 , I found that `try_reserve_exact` suggests `reserve` for further insertions. I think it's a mistake by copy&paste, `try_reserve` is better here.
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2021
…scottmcm Suggest try_reserve in try_reserve_exact During developing rust-lang#91529 , I found that `try_reserve_exact` suggests `reserve` for further insertions. I think it's a mistake by copy&paste, `try_reserve` is better here.
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2021
…scottmcm Suggest try_reserve in try_reserve_exact During developing rust-lang#91529 , I found that `try_reserve_exact` suggests `reserve` for further insertions. I think it's a mistake by copy&paste, `try_reserve` is better here.
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2021
…scottmcm Suggest try_reserve in try_reserve_exact During developing rust-lang#91529 , I found that `try_reserve_exact` suggests `reserve` for further insertions. I think it's a mistake by copy&paste, `try_reserve` is better here.
Member
|
lgtm, just needs a tracking issue. I agree that you should setup a new one since the related feature has already merged. |
Contributor
Author
Is it necessary for me to create an RFC other than for tracking issues? |
Member
No, not in this case. |
Signed-off-by: TennyZhuang <zty0826@gmail.com>
TennyZhuang
force-pushed
the
try_reserve_binary_heap
branch
from
a434385 to
d0f8793
Compare
5 tasks
Contributor
Author
Member
|
Looks great, thank you very much! @bors r+ |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 2235af1 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2021
…, r=yaahc add BinaryHeap::try_reserve and BinaryHeap::try_reserve_exact `try_reserve` of many collections were stablized in rust-lang#87993 in 1.57.0. Add `try_reserve` for the rest collections such as `BinaryHeap` should be not controversial.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2021
…askrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#91529 (add BinaryHeap::try_reserve and BinaryHeap::try_reserve_exact) - rust-lang#91820 (Suggest to specify a target triple when lang item is missing) - rust-lang#91851 (Make `MaybeUninit::zeroed` `const`) - rust-lang#91875 (Use try_normalize_erasing_regions in RevealAllVisitor) - rust-lang#91887 (Remove `in_band_lifetimes` from `rustc_const_eval`) - rust-lang#91892 (Fix HashStable implementation on InferTy) - rust-lang#91893 (Remove `in_band_lifetimes` from `rustc_hir`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
try_reserveof many collections were stablized in #87993 in 1.57.0. Addtry_reservefor the rest collections such asBinaryHeapshould be not controversial.