feat(envs): add akamai-functions@1.0

[vdice]

• Adds the Akamai Functions 1.0 world configuration

Draft for now while still in testing mode using my fork/ghcr.io, etc. However, I figured it would be useful to have this up as a reference when considering the broader Akamai Functions env and templates versioning strategy (eg akamai-developers/akamai-functions-spin-templates#3).

• Also, hoping for input on what information should live under the capabilities configuration -- and/or spots to update/change/add/etc. done: no capabilities required currently

If keen, you can test the flow with this config and the templates on my fork via:

spin new -E https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vdice/spin-environments/7d3362639aab2ef56b85e486b606a42099e48e20/envs/akamai-functions/akamai-functions%401.0.toml

[itowlson]

Is there value in having a tag here, rather than tracking main? I guess maybe it allows AF to be more conscious about moving templates forward, but I worry that tagging templates plus revving the env will be a piece of admin overhead that gets forgotten...

[itowlson]

My understanding is that AF is unversioned?

[itowlson]

Also re naming: the expectation with env names is that users will type them in spin new -E. You may therefore want to consider a shorter string than akamai-functions to mitigate typing errors and people falling asleep halfway through writing it out!

(Although I think we will have completions for env names so maybe it's okay!)

[kate-goldenring]

i think a tag may be needed. For example, if we add back in the python template (ref akamai-developers/akamai-functions-spin-templates#4 (comment)), without tagging here, we'd need to bump the worlds here before merging that to main in order to ensure the environment config works together.

[kate-goldenring]

do we anticipate this list ever getting longer? my understanding is no -- we will just update this akamai:functions/http-trigger@v world version

[vdice]

I'm not sure; tagging @fibonacci1729 and @itowlson who concocted this set for the AF world. If the list were liable to change, would that imply we'd indeed want this env toml versioned?

[fibonacci1729]

I don't think this list will change and if it did that would imply the WIT package added a new world which would prompt a new environment (e.g. akamai-functions@1.1 or ...@2.0)