Mark KeyViz adapter labels implemented#1028
Conversation
|
@codex review |
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the design document 2026_04_28_implemented_keyviz_adapter_labels.md to change its status from 'proposed' to 'implemented' and updates a reference to another design document to reflect its 'implemented' status. There are no review comments, and I have no feedback to provide.
Important
The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 3adbf372ad
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
| --- | |||
| status: proposed | |||
| status: implemented | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Keep adapter labels marked proposed until code lands
This status now advertises the adapter-label design as complete, but the current tree still lacks the implementation the document describes: keyviz.Sampler.Observe still has no label parameter (keyviz/sampler.go:79), there is no keyviz/labels.go from a repo-wide file search, and the JSON KeyVizRow still has no label field (internal/admin/keyviz_handler.go:86). In any checkout after this commit, design/status consumers will treat per-adapter KeyViz labels as available even though operators cannot enable --keyvizLabelsEnabled or get labeled rows, so this should remain proposed/partial until the implementation is present in the same tree.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
|
|
||
| - Phase 2-C (current): `(bucketID, raftGroupID, leaderTerm, | ||
| windowStart)` per design `2026_04_27_proposed_keyviz_cluster_fanout.md` | ||
| windowStart)` per design `2026_04_27_implemented_keyviz_cluster_fanout.md` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Point the fan-out reference at an existing design
This new reference is broken in the current tree: searching docs/design for *keyviz_cluster_fanout* only finds 2026_04_27_proposed_keyviz_cluster_fanout.md, not the implemented filename used here. If this commit is browsed or checked before the dependent rename lands, readers and link checkers are sent to a non-existent design; keep the proposed filename until the dependency is included, or include the referenced rename in this change.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
|
adapter-label support is not present in the current tree yet, so this promotion should not land as implemented. Closing this draft until the sampler/API/UI implementation is added. |
Author: bootjp
Summary
Dependency
Verification